New dsp dropping this month

[Kyblack76]

I have 4 panamenian SQ champs on my team using the Audison Bit Ten, trust me, get that one, is not expensive at all and you can even keep the Stock Head unit, no need to spend a lot of money on a HU and still not getting the same result as you can get on a nice DSP, is very easy to use btw, not like the crappy 3sixty software

I have 4 panamenian SQ champs on my team using the Audison Bit Ten, trust me, get that one, is not expensive at all and you can even keep the Stock Head unit, no need to spend a lot of money on a HU and still not getting the same result as you can get on a nice DSP, is very easy to use btw, not like the crappy 3sixty software

i happen to think the 3sixty.3 software is extremely easy

I know weve done the rounds on this before Steve. I even talked to you about it when you let us kick it at the shop at auto rama 2 years ago. (thanks again by the way,.. such a rad time, and you where a stellar host, i still feel like i got cheated on the ping pong lol) My back still hurts acting like i could pick up your SMD driver lol.

I had the RF.1 and RF.2, and quickly bought the RF.3. I loved my .2 at the time. The .3 was nothing but issues and struggles. Never connected and stayed connected faithfully.

The knob, ..the worst,.. man, it would not jump through selections reliable, ever, THEN, would go FULL tilt out of no where. Like, out of no where.

Saving programs was near impossible, i tried this cable, that cable, and 3 updates, talked to Forrest at RF for 3 weeks. Man... struggle.

Granted, again, i bought it and had it running weeks after launch. I expected some hiccups, but man,... i did NOT care for that dsp at all at the time. Im sure some updates helped. But, just my honest opinion,... i prefered the .2 by FAR. Just me. No hate. Just what i had going on, and 2 others that bought one after me, also struggled, sold them and bought others. Just the time i had with it.......just my experiance.

just because you had issues with your's doesn't mean the software itself is difficult...and just because you had an issue with your's does not mean everyone has. I mean i had some hiccups in the beginning with one of them (when they first came out and i got one of the very first) Got a new one and that was that. No need to spend the next 5 years complaining about it. If it bothered you that much, and i can see it did, then don't buy the .4. I will be the first in line though.

Just talking about my experiance dude. Shit, Setting slopes, cuts, tweaking the bands was easy. It was just the other issues i had. Adjusting what i could with the .3 was easier than the .2. Was just the other issues. Thats all man. Its not like it kicked my dog or anything.

[baron_of_bass]

OP I think mosconi is one of the better sq brands out there. If you happen to pull the trigger you won't be dissatisfied with a mosconi product

[06RTCharger]

OP I think mosconi is one of the better sq brands out there. If you happen to pull the trigger you won't be dissatisfied with a mosconi product

Thanks for stayin on topic . Have you checked it out yet, the 8to12 Areospace? You notice any cons? Just tryna get some SQ guys input on that specific unit.

[06RTCharger]

I have 4 panamenian SQ champs on my team using the Audison Bit Ten, trust me, get that one, is not expensive at all and you can even keep the Stock Head unit, no need to spend a lot of money on a HU and still not getting the same result as you can get on a nice DSP, is very easy to use btw, not like the crappy 3sixty software

Yah i was looking at those also, the bit ten and bit one. This wasnt a HU post tho lol, im still working on deciding on one, choice will be made soon.

[06RTCharger]

I have 4 panamenian SQ champs on my team using the Audison Bit Ten, trust me, get that one, is not expensive at all and you can even keep the Stock Head unit, no need to spend a lot of money on a HU and still not getting the same result as you can get on a nice DSP, is very easy to use btw, not like the crappy 3sixty software

I have 4 panamenian SQ champs on my team using the Audison Bit Ten, trust me, get that one, is not expensive at all and you can even keep the Stock Head unit, no need to spend a lot of money on a HU and still not getting the same result as you can get on a nice DSP, is very easy to use btw, not like the crappy 3sixty software

i happen to think the 3sixty.3 software is extremely easy

I know weve done the rounds on this before Steve. I even talked to you about it when you let us kick it at the shop at auto rama 2 years ago. (thanks again by the way,.. such a rad time, and you where a stellar host, i still feel like i got cheated on the ping pong lol) My back still hurts acting like i could pick up your SMD driver lol.

I had the RF.1 and RF.2, and quickly bought the RF.3. I loved my .2 at the time. The .3 was nothing but issues and struggles. Never connected and stayed connected faithfully.

The knob, ..the worst,.. man, it would not jump through selections reliable, ever, THEN, would go FULL tilt out of no where. Like, out of no where.

Saving programs was near impossible, i tried this cable, that cable, and 3 updates, talked to Forrest at RF for 3 weeks. Man... struggle.

Granted, again, i bought it and had it running weeks after launch. I expected some hiccups, but man,... i did NOT care for that dsp at all at the time. Im sure some updates helped. But, just my honest opinion,... i prefered the .2 by FAR. Just me. No hate. Just what i had going on, and 2 others that bought one after me, also struggled, sold them and bought others. Just the time i had with it.......just my experiance.

just because you had issues with your's doesn't mean the software itself is difficult...and just because you had an issue with your's does not mean everyone has. I mean i had some hiccups in the beginning with one of them (when they first came out and i got one of the very first) Got a new one and that was that. No need to spend the next 5 years complaining about it. If it bothered you that much, and i can see it did, then don't buy the .4. I will be the first in line though.

Hey steve, first things first, thanks for the site and products u provide man, awesome stuff. Always watchin the youtubes also. Is the 4 already in the works? Any inside scoops you can give about it? Lol

[White Lightning]

I do not understand why when ever the term "sound quality" comes up, people automatically say processor.

The only MAJOR thing you need when it come to sound quality is time alignment. You do not need a processor to accomplish this.

Buy you a good head unit with built in time alignment and move on. If you need much more than this, then you REALLY need to rethink and redesign your system.

/Rant

[fecupe2001]

so, having delay, a much better TA than most of HU TA´s bring, having a 30 band EQ, slope, much better x-over than the Hu doesn´t worth the money? i agree with you, HU is enough to get a great sound but a dsp is way better and easier, just my opinion...

[06RTCharger]

I do not understand why when ever the term "sound quality" comes up, people automatically say processor.

The only MAJOR thing you need when it come to sound quality is time alignment. You do not need a processor to accomplish this.

Buy you a good head unit with built in time alignment and move on. If you need much more than this, then you REALLY need to rethink and redesign your system.

/Rant

To each their own.

[ToNasty]

I do not understand why when ever the term "sound quality" comes up, people automatically say processor.

The only MAJOR thing you need when it come to sound quality is time alignment. You do not need a processor to accomplish this.

Buy you a good head unit with built in time alignment and move on. If you need much more than this, then you REALLY need to rethink and redesign your system.

/Rant

This all the way.

[meade916]

I do not understand why when ever the term "sound quality" comes up, people automatically say processor.

The only MAJOR thing you need when it come to sound quality is time alignment. You do not need a processor to accomplish this.

Buy you a good head unit with built in time alignment and move on. If you need much more than this, then you REALLY need to rethink and redesign your system.

/Rant

This all the way.

not quite. Although time alignment is one of the most important things, it isn't the ONLY thing. I like a powerful processor with lot's of options. I like my Eq's. I try not to boost and only cut around my valleys rather than match peaks. But cars being the worst environment there is and so many being so different and affecting the sound in different ways by being shaped different (the cabin), they need help some times. I don't need to "rethink" any of my system's simply because i prefer a 3sixty.3. I also like what i see in all the other brands too. I love the on screen programming they are all doing now. It isn't just an RF thing for me, i like them all (so long as they work properly).

Now a processor or an EQ in the hands of someone who doesn't know how to use it properly might not always be helpful. I can agree to that.