oldsoundguy Posted February 1, 2014 Report Share Posted February 1, 2014 That's the part that confuses me. Does more air flow increase bass sound in an enclosure? I am not sure if it has anything to do with it at all. Tuned in for sure though. 80prs Arc Audio Xdi 1200.6 (using active crossovers) Freaking awesome amplifier Incriminator IA 10.1 Focal PS 130v 5.25 (doors) 4" Faital pro Neo (kick panels) 3" Faital pro Neo and focal tweets( dash) DC Audio level 3 12" custom box designed by joex built by me AGM front, XS 750SE batteries rear DC 180 alt 99 Toyota Tacoma extra cab http://www.stevemeadedesigns.com/board/topic/179476-my-small-build-turned-into-the-ongoing-build/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bbeljefe Posted February 1, 2014 Report Share Posted February 1, 2014 That's the part that confuses me. Does more air flow increase bass sound in an enclosure? I am not sure if it has anything to do with it at all. Tuned in for sure though. That's the goal of this discussion... to find out if perfect air flow would actually help or harm sound pressure. Or at least, that's my goal, lol. In simple terms, the more air a sub moves the more sound pressure it creates. But when you're using both the front and the back of the driver's piston, there are considerations to be made for the phase of the back wave. If the back wave is 180° out of phase with the front wave, then cancellation occurs but if it's only slightly out of phase sound pressure increases. I've been thinking about this whole issue and it seems to me that ¼ wave theory could shed some light on the matter. I know there are a lot of people who go to enormous pains to make perfectly rounded corners in transmission lines but I don't know of any studies where those boxes were tested against an identical box with only 45° wave guides and/or no wave guides at all. That would be interesting and very informative. Also, I think transmission lines would be ideal for testing air flow differences because there is a minimum amount of internal pressure in the cabinet relative to a conventional vented box. Facebook: facebook.com/audioanarchyllc Instagram: audioanarchyllc Youtube: youtube.com/bbeljefe Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TeamHT Posted February 1, 2014 Report Share Posted February 1, 2014 1/4 wave. Exactly what I'm rereading up on to form an educated hypothesis, lol Tell me...does this smell like chloroform to you? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oldsoundguy Posted February 1, 2014 Report Share Posted February 1, 2014 It would be interesting to see results. 80prs Arc Audio Xdi 1200.6 (using active crossovers) Freaking awesome amplifier Incriminator IA 10.1 Focal PS 130v 5.25 (doors) 4" Faital pro Neo (kick panels) 3" Faital pro Neo and focal tweets( dash) DC Audio level 3 12" custom box designed by joex built by me AGM front, XS 750SE batteries rear DC 180 alt 99 Toyota Tacoma extra cab http://www.stevemeadedesigns.com/board/topic/179476-my-small-build-turned-into-the-ongoing-build/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Krakin Posted February 1, 2014 Report Share Posted February 1, 2014 This relates very closely to the book I have started reading, The Sensations of a Tone as a Physiological Basis for the Theory pf Music, by Hermann Ludwig F. von Helmholtz. The Helmholtz resonator has applications in combustion engines, subwoofers, acoustics, intake systems, and much other things. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Helmholtz_resonance You can read the book, or download it, from here for free http://books.google.com/books?id=Xy4DAAAAQAAJ&printsec=frontcover&dq=on+the+sensations+of+a+tone+as+a+physiological&hl=en&sa=X&ei=PEPtUryUNMbmyQGnrYGICA&ved=0CCkQ6AEwAA#v=onepage&q=on%20the%20sensations%20of%20a%20tone%20as%20a%20physiological&f=false Krakin's Home Dipole Project http://www.stevemeadedesigns.com/board/topic/186153-krakins-dipole-project-new-reciever-in-rockford-science/#entry2772370 Krakin, are you some sort of mad scientist? I would have replied earlier, but I was measuring the output of my amp with a yardstick . . . What you hear is not the air pressure variation in itself but what has drawn your attention in the two streams of superimposed air pressure variations at your eardrums An acoustic event has dimensions of Time, Tone, Loudness and Space Everyone learns to render the 3-dimensional localization of sound based on the individual shape of their ears, thus no formula can achieve a definite effect for every listener. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bbeljefe Posted February 1, 2014 Report Share Posted February 1, 2014 1/4 wave. Exactly what I'm rereading up on to form an educated hypothesis, lol Agreed. I need to do some reading myself. Facebook: facebook.com/audioanarchyllc Instagram: audioanarchyllc Youtube: youtube.com/bbeljefe Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ParDeus Posted February 1, 2014 Author Report Share Posted February 1, 2014 The easy route would be to model it in CFD, but that only is a model to tell us what a certain design should do physically more than acoustically. I can build a t-line and put pitot tubes in certain areas to measure localized pressures and velocities. I also have a minimally invasive air flow meter that can measure total energy output as a function of either rpm or oscillation. A swirl/tumble meter can also be used to measure what any upsteam changes have on flow linearity at the terminus of the port. And of course a term lab at the port. Then the challenge becomes graphing all this data to be able to draw conclusions on how any changes affect total output. And of course all this will have to be done a-b-a. I will start with flow visualization to decide where to put the pitot tubes. Any input on designing the enclosure and what driver to use? Or should I just do the standard 1/4 wave of the drivers Fs with port area equaling pis5on area? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CleanSierra Posted February 1, 2014 Report Share Posted February 1, 2014 I like threads like this, I'm watching. Im not the one you want to try to troll. Just a fyi for you. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Smoove Posted February 1, 2014 Report Share Posted February 1, 2014 Damn, time to tear my box apart and start over 2 Team Fi 15's v1 2 DD M5's 970amps of Alt 6th order blowthroughThe truck Blowthrough build : http://www.stevemeadedesigns.com/board/topic/155555-smooves-1996-chevy-ext-cab-c1500-slow-build/The 350z build : http://www.stevemeadedesigns.com/board/topic/170694-smooves-2003-nissan-350z/ My FB page https://www.facebook.com/pages/Smooves-Car-Audio-and-performance/719746144805343 Team Fi Audio http://www.ficaraudio.com/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jessica Posted February 1, 2014 Report Share Posted February 1, 2014 Would a port with no pressure zones, I mean, none that are substantially higher/lower than other places in the port be best? I say this because the port has to kind of work like a pump. Air flows both ways at a fairly high rate. Think about the air speed and volume of air and how the sub has to force that air to come to a dead stop and change direction over and over 20 to 80 times a second. If you had a dead zone of low pressure in your port or a very high pressure zone because of whatever reason. Say a 90 or 45 or whatever. I could see how that would kill output or cause other issues. Rest in peace, walled 87 accord build log 03' Corolla build with AA Mayhem inside. My super random youtube channel and terrible camera work. Wiring comparison by CaptainzPlanetz Wire and fuse guide by Guest SyKo13 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.